AI
SonarQube Agentic Analysis: Verify AI code as it is generated
Verify AI code in real-time to stop security risks before PRs. Use the trusted SonarQube engine to find & fix agent errors in seconds. Join the beta now.
Read article >
Introducing Sonar Context Augmentation
Sonar Context Augmentation injects SonarQube into AI agents like Cursor and Claude Code for fewer errors, lower costs, and better AI code review.
Read article >
The future is AC/DC: the Agent Centric Development Cycle
The era of Continuous Integration, with its familiar processes and workflows, is rapidly coming to an end. Traditional CI relies on developers making small, frequent, iterative commits. Today, the “continuous” part is changing.
Read article >
How to optimize SonarQube for reviewing AI-generated code
Without guardrails, AI-generated code introduces technical debt, security vulnerabilities, and reliability issues that are hard to track.
Read article >
Code generation tradeoffs: A comparison of Claude Opus 4.5 and 4.6
We recently ran a small experiment to see how Claude Opus 4.5 and the newer Opus 4.6 handled a specific backend task. The goal wasn't to see which one was necessarily better, but to understand the differences in their coding styles.
Read article >
The intelligence paradox: Why Claude Opus 4.6 requires verification
Read on for an exhaustive comparison of the technical architectures of Claude Opus 4.5 and 4.6, an evaluation of their performance across industry-standard benchmarks, and an outline of Sonar’s focus on embracing agentic development.
Read article >