SECURE EVERY LINE OF CODE

Secure by design 

Code security is critical for business success. Sonar enables organizations to adopt a shift-left approach, seamlessly integrating security into the early stages of software development in alignment with NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) guidelines.

Request demoExplore our Security Solution
secure

The challenges of code security

Organizations strive to protect their codebase against risks, yet often, the focus on code security tends to emerge later in the development lifecycle rather than as an initial investment in secure-by-design practices. This common approach not only increases business risks but also escalates maintenance and remediation costs. By delaying the early integration of code security measures, a substantial burden is placed on development teams to retroactively tackle security issues, which in turn can significantly slow down project delivery. This delayed security focus undermines efforts to enhance the security posture, leading to software that may fulfill functional needs but falls short in crucial aspects of security and overall quality.

secrets in code are vulnerable
lightbulg

The right approach for secure code

Early investment in code security reduces risks and costs and improves development speed.

Organizations require changes in their security approach coupled with the right tools that proactively integrate security by design practices from the early stages of the software development lifecycle (SDLC). The shift-left approach enables organizations to develop more secure software by identifying and reducing security vulnerabilities early in code development. It ensures that the software not only meets the specific criteria set by the organization but also complies with secure coding standards, such as the NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF). Organizations can significantly improve their security posture by providing a developer-focused approach and tooling that conforms with NIST SSDF best practices.   

code is reliable and secure
SOLUTION & BENEFITS

Sonar secures your development lifecycle

secure

Comprehensive analysis

Sonar identifies security vulnerabilities across 30+ programming languages, frameworks, and infrastructure technologies. Its comprehensive security analysis capabilities uncover a wide spectrum of security concerns, from SQL injection vulnerabilities and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks to buffer overflows, authentication issues, IaC misconfigurations, and cloud secrets detection. Utilizing a highly accurate analysis engine, with a true positive rate (TPR) of over 90%, Sonar has over 7000+ static analysis rules that uncover both quality and security issues related to the consistency, intentionality, adaptability, and responsibility of code.

arrows pointing up on a diagonal

Beyond security issues

Sonar's approach to secure code extends beyond mere identification of security vulnerabilities. It is a holistic approach that evaluates maintainability, reliability, cognitive complexity, performance issues, and other coding weaknesses that could potentially create security vulnerabilities.

Issues compromising the maintainability and reliability of code are not just quality concerns but pose significant risks to an organization's security framework. For instance, code plagued with bugs, performance inefficiencies, or flawed regular expressions not only degrades system functionality but also becomes susceptible to malicious exploits, such as Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, jeopardizing system stability and security. This comprehensive approach underscores the importance of addressing all aspects of code quality to safeguard against security threats effectively.

magnifying glass

Early detection of security vulnerabilities

Sonar's tools seamlessly integrate into your software development lifecycle, from the IDE to the CI/CD pipeline. By providing real-time, developer-centric feedback, Sonar ensures that security becomes an integral, yet unintrusive, element throughout your development process.

checklist

Compliance with regulatory standards

Aligned with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF), Sonar security guidelines adhere to required security and regulatory standards including Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), CWE, OWASP Application Security Verification Standards (ASVS) and OWASP Top 10 with comprehensive reporting that meets the need of security auditors. 

Key features for code security

Sonar ensures end-to-end secure code, from initial development to release, by maintaining consistent standards for security and quality throughout the development pipeline.

Explore our Security Solution
developer

Advanced SAST analysis

Sonar's advanced SAST capabilities uncover hidden vulnerabilities in application code – particularly detecting security issues in user code that may arise from third-party open-source libraries. This unique feature enables the tracing of data flow in and out of libraries, effectively uncovering deeply concealed security vulnerabilities that other tools fail to detect.

feedback

Secrets detection

Sonar excels in identifying a range of code issues across over 30 languages. Using Regular Expressions and Semantic Analysis, it specializes in detecting secrets within source code. SonarQube for IDE’s IDE integration scans code in real-time, preventing secrets from reaching repositories, complemented by SonarQube Server and SonarQube Cloud which secure your repository and CI/CD pipeline.

pdf

Security reports

Sonar's security reports offer a clear view of code compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, ASVS 4.0, and CWE Top 25. These reports provide a view of where a project stands compared to the most common mistakes. They also facilitate regulatory compliance and vulnerability management, distinguishing between vulnerability fixes and Security Hotspot Reviews at both project and portfolio levels.

Featured customer story

BAE SYSTEMS

BAE Systems is an international defense, aerospace, and security company providing advanced, technology-led defense, aerospace, and security solutions. Its major business lines include electronic warfare, sensing and communications equipment, armored vehicles, artillery systems, naval guns and naval ship repair, and cybersecurity and intelligence services. 

Read more
Image

Detect insecure, bad code early with SonarQube Server

Security Architect

“Sonar teaches all our developers to write better, faster, and more secure code. It prevents bugs from reaching the master branch.”

Alin TirleaSecurity Architect/AppSec Manager

Read customer stories
DEVELOPER'S GUIDE

Shift left

"Shift left" is a practice that involves moving critical development practices earlier in the software development lifecycle (SDLC).

Learn more

BLOG POST

Leveraging SonarQube Server, SonarQube Cloud, and SonarQube for IDE for effective shift left practices

Speed and quality are no longer trade-offs in the modern software landscape - they're a tightly interwoven dance. That's where the "shift left" philosophy comes in, urging us to move critical checks and balances like code quality analysis earlier in the development lifecycle.

Read more

WEBINAR

Secure by design: how implementing good quality methodology delivers better software security

Join Jonathan Slaughter, Security Governance Officer, to hear about the real shift left approach, where code quality serves as a catalyst for secure code.

Watch now

INTERACTIVE DEMO

Detect insecure, bad code early with SonarQube Server

View our interactive demo to see the advanced security detection capabilities available in SonarQube Server that help keep all code secure.

View demo

Build trust into every line of code

Rating image
4.6 / 5

A G2 Leader for 6 years running

Get startedContact sales

Secure by Design FAQs

What is NIST SSDF and how does it support a secure-by-design approach?

The NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) is a set of practices that helps organizations systematically build security into every phase of the software development lifecycle. Its practices are organized into groups covering preparing the organization, protecting the software, producing well-secured software, and responding to vulnerabilities. This aligns with a secure-by-design mindset, where security is treated as a fundamental requirement alongside code quality and reliability.

Sonar’s security guidelines are aligned with the NIST SSDF. Because the SSDF is a framework of practices, a tool can support those practices, but using one does not by itself establish SSDF conformance.

How can SonarQube help my team implement NIST SSDF practices?

SonarQube acts as a developer-first platform that embeds security and quality checks directly into the coding workflow, helping teams support  key NIST SSDF practices such as reviewing and analyzing code for vulnerabilities, automated verification, and remediation. By analyzing source code in pull requests and CI/CD pipelines, SonarQube flags security vulnerabilities, code smells, and reliability issues with precise, line-of-code guidance so developers can fix problems early.

Quality gates, project baselines, and governance features support policy enforcement, auditable controls, and consistent adherence to secure-by-design standards. Using SonarQube supports, but does not by itself establish, compliance with the SSDF.

What is the difference between SAST and DAST, and where does SonarQube fit?

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) analyzes source code, bytecode, or binaries without executing the application, identifying vulnerabilities such as injection flaws, insecure data handling, or authorization issues before software runs, whereas Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) probes a running application from the outside to detect exploitable behaviors and misconfigurations in real environments.

SonarQube is built around SAST and focuses on developers and the code itself, integrating into IDEs, pull requests, and CI/CD so issues are found and fixed early. With SonarQube Advanced Security, it extends to open source dependencies through software composition analysis (SCA) and container scanning. DAST tools complement this by validating runtime behavior in staging and production environments.

Should I prioritize SAST or DAST when building a secure-by-design program?

Most teams get the best results by starting with SAST because it fits naturally into daily development work, provides immediate feedback at the file and line level, and helps developers fix root causes before vulnerabilities ever make it into a running application.

Once this foundation is in place, DAST can be added as a complementary layer to test deployed services for real-world exploitability, configuration issues, and environment-specific weaknesses, giving you both a code-centric “shift-left” layer and a runtime validation layer that together align well with NIST SSDF and secure-by-design principles.

How does SonarQube support a “focus on new code” or “new code quality” strategy?

SonarQube enables a “new code quality” approach where teams concentrate on keeping new or changed code free of issues, rather than trying to fix all legacy problems at once, which aligns with practices such as starting left with code quality and focusing on recently modified components. By defining quality gates on new code, SonarQube can block pull requests that introduce new bugs, vulnerabilities, or security hotspots, while still allowing the existing baseline to be addressed incrementally, making it practical to improve code quality analysis and code security analysis standards without freezing development.

What is SonarQube Cloud and how does it differ from SonarQube Server?

SonarQube Cloud delivers the core SonarQube experience as a fully managed cloud service, removing the need to provision, scale, or maintain your own instance while still giving developers automated analysis in pull requests and CI pipelines. With SonarQube Cloud, Sonar operates the platform infrastructure and updates, and you simply connect your repositories and pipelines.

SonarQube Server runs on your own infrastructure, giving you maximum control over deployment architecture, data residency, and integration with internal systems, which can be important in regulated or highly customized environments.Either way, teams get the same secure-by-design checks in their development workflow.

How does SonarQube for IDE help developers follow secure-by-design and NIST SSDF guidelines?

SonarQube for IDE brings SonarQube rules and issue detection directly into popular development environments so developers see security vulnerabilities, code smells, and reliability problems as they type, before code ever reaches version control. This “quality from the start” experience reinforces secure-by-design habits and NIST SSDF practices by making secure coding guidance immediate and contextual, reducing back-and-forth in code review, and helping teams prevent vulnerabilities up front instead of relying solely on late-stage testing.

Which security and compliance standards do SonarQube’s security reports cover?

Sonar’s security reports show where a project stands against standards including the OWASP Top 10, OWASP ASVS 4.0, and CWE Top 25, and Sonar’s security guidelines support requirements such as PCI DSS and align with NIST SSDF. The reports distinguish between vulnerability fixes and Security Hotspot reviews at both project and portfolio levels.

These reports give security auditors and engineering leaders a clear view of code security posture and support regulatory compliance and vulnerability management. They help document compliance efforts but do not by themselves establish that an application or organization is compliant.

How does SonarQube fit into a layered security strategy based on frameworks like NIST AI RMF?

In a layered security approach aligned with standards such as the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, SonarQube serves as the foundational, code-centric layer that ensures applications are built with security and code quality analysis in mind before they run, while other tools and controls handle runtime monitoring, infrastructure hardening, and model- or data-specific protections.

By making SonarQube a mandatory gate in pull requests and CI/CD pipelines, organizations can enforce systematic security and quality checks at the earliest point of change and then complement this with additional runtime, infrastructure, and AI-specific defenses to achieve a robust defense-in-depth posture.