AI
The intelligence paradox: Why Claude Opus 4.6 requires verification
Read on for an exhaustive comparison of the technical architectures of Claude Opus 4.5 and 4.6, an evaluation of their performance across industry-standard benchmarks, and an outline of Sonar’s focus on embracing agentic development.
Read article >
Managing the tricky relationship between AI and code security
The sixth installment in our series, where we examine a critical tension in modern development: the tricky relationship between AI and code security.
Read article >
Claude Code + SonarQube MCP: Building an autonomous code review workflow
Claude Opus 4.6 has just been released, and we are officially in the age of hyper-speed coding. These incredible tools are able to generate code at even more incredible speeds.
Read article >
Automating quality gate success with Claude Opus 4.6 and SonarQube MCP
We’ve all been there: you push a feature branch on a Friday afternoon, convinced it is solid. You switch to the next task, only to get a notification twenty minutes later: quality gate failed.
Read article >
The great toil shift: How AI is redefining technical debt
We’ve seen that while AI is accelerating the speed of generation, it has created a dangerous bottleneck in code verification. This brings us to the fifth installment in our series, where we examine the on-the-ground reality for software engineers.
Read article >
Join the SonarQube Remediation Agent Beta
The biggest bottleneck in any modern CI/CD pipeline isn’t writing the code—it’s the “review-fix-verify” loop that happens when a quality gate fails. Today, we’re taking a step toward closing that loop by opening sign-ups for the SonarQube Remediation Agent Beta.
Read article >